-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
github-action: Add AsciiDoc freeze warning #16969
github-action: Add AsciiDoc freeze warning #16969
Conversation
@@ -2,7 +2,8 @@ | |||
name: Comment on PR for .asciidoc changes | |||
|
|||
on: | |||
pull_request: | |||
# We need to use pull_request_target to be able to comment on PRs from forks | |||
pull_request_target: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Given the comment-on-asciidoc-changes
workflow checks out the code from a PR, allowing the action to run from forks is inherently risky. While I dont see an injection point for execution of malicious code I think it is a significant surface area to try to keep safe. Would it be possible to instead use the github API to detect if files are changed (Rather than checking out the code in the action context? https://docs.github.com/en/rest/pulls/pulls?apiVersion=2022-11-28#list-pull-requests-files )
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for the feedback.
I just found that the action in use can utilize the GitHub API instead of git.
https://github.com/tj-actions/changed-files?tab=readme-ov-file#using-githubs-api-octocat
I will verify if this works as expected for forks.
… branches (#17072) * github-action: Add AsciiDoc freeze warning (#16969) * Add 9.0 branch to the CI branches definition (#16997) * Core version bump to 9.1.0 (#16991) * Use centralized source of truth for active branches (#17063) This commit simplifies the DRA process in Logstash by removing the need to maintain a separate file for the active branches, and instead rely on a centrally maintained file containing source of truth. While at it, we refactor/simplify the creation of an array with the versions in `.buildkite/scripts/snyk/resolve_stack_version.sh`. * Fix conflicts --------- Co-authored-by: Jan Calanog <nejcalanog@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Mashhur <99575341+mashhurs@users.noreply.github.com>
Details
Add a workflow that will comment on PRs with AsciiDoc changes.
Why
During the migration to Elastic Docs v3, the Docs team will focus exclusively on migrating content.
To maintain consistency, prevent conflicts, and ensure a smoother transition we will freeze all AsciiDoc changes.
This means you will get a warning when you create AsciiDoc changes in your PRs.
See elastic/docs-builder#281 for details
If there are any questions, please reach out to the @elastic/docs-engineering